LastDodo site & app/Background pages166 messages

I know, but if you enter a link that starts with that, that link will not work.

I search the catalog for Spirou.

I go directly to: Spirou (magazine)

I click on the first issue and look at the catalog details.

Here I see 'Volume 1938' and click on it. So I get beautiful the numbers of the weeklbad that appeared in 1938. Since I knew some information about this, I created a page.

Until there no problem but ...

apparently this also all falls under 'Year 1938'.

Am I doing something wrong?

Creating background pages for fantasy series is indeed not sensible. Also does not work with eg 'Lombard editions'. About 'Year 1938' you can at most say that it is the 38th sequential year indication within the numbered structuring of a journal ... (;-)

Creating background pages for fantasy sequences does not make sense

I understand, but the fact that it is possible makes it confusing.

About 'Year 1938' you can at most say that it is the 38th sequential year indication within the numbered structuring of a magazine ...

Right, but I thought I could say something about 'Volume 1938 '... of the weekly magazine Spirou.

So it is best to delete it.

Can someone remove the incorrectly linked background page from the language Dutch in the section Books ?!

Well, I've been around for a while, but do you know I have no idea where that should be? Didn't find it in the last half hour either. (;-)

Review background page? Or is this thought too simple

I looked there, but found nothing.

You can safely reject and change there, with those options you should still be able to delete the relevant page.

Yes, I thought so too. Maybe another administrator can give it another try and I just look over it ... A fresh look sometimes works wonders.

It is possible that the following proposal has already been made a number of times, but it is also written so much that reading through it takes a lot of time.

When you open an item you will see exactly where extra information is added. is.

It would help if you, as a visitor or administrator, could see on every overview of the various inputs / fields whether there is background information.

With an overview of eg themes it could be very stimulating to add background pages and complete the matter as much as possible.

I am much more in the mood to temporarily turn off the background pages until everything works properly ... (:-)

The tricky part is that you can get to a background page in various ways. And I think that is important for the system how you get there.

It may have the correct name above, but if you got there the wrong way, it will also be classified incorrectly.

AAAARGH!

Hard returns are still not displayed properly on the background page.

In the Preview it looks perfect, but on the background page itself it becomes a completely unreadable typeface .

If this cannot be resolved in the short term, this page may be removed from me (ie rejected).

I'll have this checked.

Ik had dit een paar jaar geleden ook al gemeld, vanwege mijn Franka-pagina. Daar is het minder storend, dus ben ik geduldig blijven wachten op een oplossing. Dat zal ik nu ook maar doen ;-)

I had already reported this a few years ago, because of my Franka page . It is less disturbing there, so I waited patiently for a solution. That's what I'll do now ;-)

I'm not into trivializing, but this seems like a piece of cake; and not even a cent.

Schijnbaar toch een duurder fluitje.

Wil een beheerder deze achtergrondpagina afkeuren?! Ik bewaar de gegevens uiteraard wel totdat alles naar behoren werkt.

Apparently a more expensive whistle.

Would an admin want to disapprove this background page?! I will of course keep the data until everything works properly.

No, don't disapprove! It is being worked on by a programmer using this as an example!

Sorry, I thought it wouldn't happen after more than two weeks.

There are more pages that can serve as an example. This one happens to be the only one that really annoys me.

Exactly the reason I use this for the programmer.

Your prayers have just been answered, Peter.

We're almost there. The double blank lines (between the paragraphs) are a bit strange.

And at Franka nothing has changed ...

Franka has also been resolved. I have checked blank lines.

I assume the newly created issues (missing images) have been noticed ?!