LastDodo site & app/Background pages166 messages

And that obligation does not apply if part of the entered data is rejected or changed? I am always curious about the items I have imported.

Op basis van jullie feedback hebben we een groot aantal verbeteringen doorgevoerd in de achtergrondpagina's. 

Ik zet de belangrijkste punten even op een rij:

• Vanaf de homepage kun je nu zien wat de nieuwste achtergrondpagina's zijn.
• Vanaf de rubriekshomepage kun je nu zien wat de nieuwste achtergrondpagina's voor de betreffende rubriek zijn.
• In het profiel van een gebruiker kun je zien welke achtergrondpagina's hij/zij heeft ingevoerd.
• Indien beheerders een nieuwe achtergrondpagina af keuren kunnen ze direct een email naar de invoerder sturen. Daarbij kunnen ze uit een dropdown ook een reden selecteren (we hebben alvast de huidige invoerregels in de drop down gezet).
• Het opslaan van de achtergrondpagina is sneller gemaakt.
• Reviews worden nu gesorteerd op de datum van de laatste wijziging.
• De issues met het verdwijnen van achtergrondpagina's en het niet goed verwerken van een review zijn opgelost. Eventuele problemen die hierdoor zijn ontstaan zijn gecorrigeerd.
• In de geschiedenis van een achtergrondpagina kun je zien welke beheerder een wijziging heeft gereviewd.
• Superbeheerders hebben een overzicht gekregen waarmee ze alle achtergrond pagina's van alle rubrieken kunnen bekijken.
• Beheerders kunnen in de beheermodule een overzicht krijgen van alle achtergrondpagina's voor de betreffende rubriek waar ze op dat moment in zitten.
• Een genummerde lijst wordt nu ook goed getoond op de achtergrondpagina zelf.
• Als je een nieuwe achtergrondpagina invoert kun je niet meer het catawiki-nummer van het nieuwste en oudste item invoeren. Dat kan alleen als je een achtergrond pagina wijzigt. Verder is de tekst over het gebruik van deze twee velden verbeterd.

Later deze week plaatsen we op de rubriekspagina's die nog niet een achtergrondpagina hebben een extra link waarmee we mensen attenderen op de mogelijkheid om een achtergrondpagina aan te maken als ze veel kennis over de betreffende rubriek hebben.

Based on your feedback, we've made many improvements to the background pages.

Let me summarize the main points:

• From the homepage you can now see what the latest background pages are.
• From the section homepage you can now see what the latest background pages are for the relevant section.
• In a user's profile you can see which background pages he/she has entered.
• If administrators disapprove of a new background page, they can immediately send an email to the contributor. They can also select a reason from a drop-down (we have already put the current entry lines in the drop-down).
• Saving the background page has been made faster.
• Reviews are now sorted by last modified date.
• The issues with background pages disappearing and reviews not being processed properly have been resolved. Any issues this caused have been corrected.
• In the history of a background page, you can see which admin has reviewed a change.
• Super administrators have been given an overview that allows them to view all background pages of all categories.
• In the management module, administrators can get an overview of all background pages for the relevant section they are currently in.
• A numbered list is now also properly displayed on the background page itself.
• If you enter a new background page, you can no longer enter the catalog number of the newest and oldest item. This is only possible if you change a background page. Furthermore, the text about the use of these two fields has been improved.

Later this week we will place an extra link on the section pages that do not yet have a background page, with which we draw people's attention to the possibility of creating a background page if they have a lot of knowledge about the relevant section.

Little question: what's the difference between "Title" and "Full title"?

P.S. Arco's "glitch" has not been fixed yet.

Super administrators have been given an overview that allows them to view all background pages of all sections.

What do you mean by this, Marco?

@books warehouse: what is the difference between title and full title?

Title is the name of the collection area. With full title, if it concerns the name of a person, the surname and first name / initials are reversed so that the name is placed there in logical order. The full title text does not really convey the meaning. Let me see how we can better call that.

@books warehouse: arco glitch

It has indeed not been fixed yet. We didn't want to take Arco's royal background away yet :-)

@arco: At the management page for the background pages, a link has been added to the top right that allows you to view all entered background pages.

@Marco: This posting suddenly reminds me that I noticed before that hard returns don't seem to work on an iPad. Can there be anything else to come up with than manual & lt; br & gt; to type when you want to start a new paragraph?

Not a lot of background pages are being added yet, but the ones there are are not really very "visible" either. May I suggest adding an icon to (links to) collection areas that already have a background page that distinguishes them, eg like in this example: http://i48.tinypic.com/etb8n4.png

If it's not too complicated to program.

@Marco: This posting suddenly reminds me that I noticed before that hard returns don't seem to work on an iPad. Can there be anything else to come up with than manual & lt; br & gt; if you want to start a new paragraph?

I had indeed entered that post on my iPad. Let's take a look.

@Books Warehouse: Not many background pages are being added yet, but the ones that exist are not really "visible" either. May I suggest adding an icon to (links to) collection areas that already have a background page that distinguishes them, eg like in this example: http://i48.tinypic.com/etb8n4.png If it is not too complicated to program.

Indeed not much is being added yet. Your solution is not difficult to program, but I don't expect it to have the intended effect. What we're going to do is put a link at the top of a rubric page asking people to create a background page. The link for the background page in the left column is not obvious enough now.

@Marco, the only effect I intended with my proposal was to make "more visible" (i.e. draw more attention to) the existing background pages. What did you think I meant?

@Marco Er wordt inderdaad nog niet veel toegevoegd. Jouw oplossing is niet moeilijk te programmeren, echter ik verwacht niet dat het het beoogde effect heeft. Wat we gaan doen is dat we boven aan een rubriekspagina een link gaan plaatsen met de vraag aan mensen om een achtergrondpagina te maken. De link voor de achtergrondpagina in de linkerkolom is nu niet opvalled genoeg.

Marco, dat zijn twee verschillende zaken:
- gebruikers van achtergrondpagina
- invoerders van achtergrondpagina

Ik vind het idee van Boekenmagazijn wel heel goed, een icoontje bij een serie, held, reeks etc. met een directe link naar de achtergrondpagina gaat het voor de gebruiker veel gemakkelijker maken om eraan te komen.

Voor de invoer: we hebben meer vrijwilligers met meer vrije tijd nodig lijkt mij.

@Marco Indeed not much is being added yet. Your solution is not difficult to program, but I don't expect it to have the intended effect. What we're going to do is we're going to put a link at the top of a category page asking people to create a background page. The link for the background page in the left column is now not noticeable enough.

Marco, those are two different things:
- background page users
- background page inputs

I think the idea of Boekenmagazijn is very good, an icon for a series, hero, series, etc. with a direct link to the background page will make it much easier for the user to get to it.

For the input: I think we need more volunteers with more free time.

@Bookmagazijn: I read your post too soon, I thought you were referring to "Not many background pages are being added yet". I get your point. I'm going to discuss what we can do with it. The icon is also nice to use in the left column of the photo gallery.

The suggestion of Boekenmagazijn has just been implemented and we also indicate more clearly that you can create a background page.

By the way, we did not directly link to the info text because the link and the icon will yield different results. That gets confusing. It has now been made so that if you click on the link you will see the icon at the top of the page

Just added a background page to Comics / Classics, but it won't be visible.

Albums was the same, but it appeared after the first change. I just can't get a working link to the Handbook in it. Is it because it is on a subdomain?

Just added a background page to Comics / Classics, but it won't be visible.

I'm just saying one thing: 3000.

@Boekenmagazijn Just added a background page to Comics / Classics, but it won't be visible.

Albums was the same, but it showed up after the first change. I just can't get a working link to the Handbook in it. Is it because it is on a subdomain?

Probably because only links to http://catawiki.nl/
are allowed. I suspect Assets is a different server.

Other than that, I have few problems. Only inserting links between / before existing links is annoying.

@Marco By the way, we did not directly link to the info text because the link and the icon will yield different results. That gets confusing. It has now been made so that if you click on the link at the top of the page you will see the icon again.

I would rather have a direct link, but okay, don't complain, it's much clearer like this :-)

I can't follow you, Arco.

It has been regularly explained that for staging areas containing more than 3000 items, changes are often not done ad hoc, but in a batch at a later date. This concerns eg Album series names, main series codes, etc ... I wouldn't be surprised if that is the case with those background pages.

The only thing Marco has never told you is when this happens. Firstly, we can never give users a concrete answer, secondly, we can never signal whether that batch has justifiably not yet been run. Because we don't know when he should walk.

Marco?

And we have the first example of (in this case probably accidental) abuse of a background page:

http://www.catawiki.nl/catalogus/munten/countries/62475-tunesie

I hope you won't mind that I have to chuckle about the creativity of someone who has been a member for 3 years, has never introduced anything and 'sees his chance'?

Well, it is indeed not the intention to sell via the background information pages. Didn't even think that that could happen. Which administrator can remove it for a moment?

Which administrator can remove it?

In this case I would send an email to an administrator.

I happened to read this forum. Have the page disapproved.