LastDodo site & app/Viewing days auctions872 messages

There are tons of tarzan comics

Déjà  vu: kavel 104 (recycling?)

Ik denk dat meneer van Oort gewoon twee van die originelen heeft gemaakt. De andere verklaring zou namelijk zijn dat iemand (per ongeluk natuurlijk) z'n eigen kavel gekocht heeft.

Déjà vu : lot 104 (recycling?)

I think Mr van Oort just made two of those originals. The other explanation would be that someone (accidentally of course) bought his own lot.

A more interesting possibility is that the buyer was not happy with it and the seller has taken back the lot.

There may be a simple explanation, but new bidders can (if they are suspicious by nature) ask yourself: what is wrong with that drawing?

(PS I found the quality rather poor, for Dulieu's doing, but according to Maarten de Meulder it is indeed authentic.)

@Boekenmagazijn, I haven't had time to check it out yet, but it reminds me that this is one of the few lots ever where it has not been possible to receive payment from the winner, despite collection actions. Fortunately, this almost never happens and in such a case we will of course block such a person from further use of Catawiki. We then propose to the seller to include it in the auction again.

Can happen. Personally, I would choose to include that statement close to the lot, to avoid speculation like the above.

Lot 104 (Jean Dulieu) is actually an amputation; it is a relic of an illustration that was originally much larger, namely the 1950 Paul comic strip 1409 (hence the black box around it). That strip belonged to Paul's first stripper period, a continuous story of nearly 3,600 episodes.

The picture was cut from the strip when Dulieu started working on his second stripper period. This second period concerned approximately 2,900 strips, divided over various stories (A, B, C, etc.). The strip strips from the first period formed the starting material. They were partly rearranged, cut up and drawn together here and there with new pictures. The old numbering was obliterated and replaced by a new code. A new text was also written under the pictures, which partly parallels the story of the first stripper period. This second stripper period was later bundled into the well-known ten square comic editions.

The suspicion that two of these images would exist - as stated above - seems out of the blue. It is true that Dulieu regularly redraws old illustrations (for reissues of his books), but only if his style had visibly improved in the meantime. That is certainly not the case here, so we must assume that the same illustration will be offered twice at Catawiki Auction. That happened earlier this year on June 20 and raised 140 euros. I would say how and why directly to (the same) provider.

And to come back to the image itself: as said, that is an amputation from strip 1409 from the first stripper period, that is not was included in the second period (the old serial number is still there).

Lot 17 of the toy auction is obviously NOT made by Skuldelev Ships , but just by Billing Boats . Skuldelev is really just the name of the hamlet where the wreck was found. :-)

Lot 148 of the comics auction : Biek ??? Incidentally, this edition contains two separate pages 45a and 45b, so-called planches refusee, which must be placed between pages 45 and 46. It is not clear to me whether or not these separate pages are an integral part of the publication.

And may I express my cautious surprise that this copy 858 is simultaneously both offered at the Catawiki auction and for sale. can be found via boekwinkeltjes.nl.

@pegag
Biek ???

Typo has been fixed, thank you for the message.

The providers are explicitly told by us that they must get their lots from other sales channels. They are required to deliver.

Lot 146 of the last Comic Auction was also on Marktplaats, so there are more

I did not know that it was also possible to offer new comics at the auction! ??

Lots 15 and 40 are still for sale everywhere in my opinion. I hope that the bidders pay attention to the total price, so that they do not pay more than the purchase price. The consignor will think differently about this and I fear that people will lose sight of that during the auction.

strips moeten minimaal 1 jaar oud zijn tenzij de boel failiet is dan is anders denk ik

dit ivm vaste boeken prijs althans voor de nl aanbieders

even gekeken kavel 15 is 1 boek uit 2012 rest is ouder

daar is volgens mij het beleid op dat het zo wel mag

prima verkoper trouwens van kavel 15

kavel 40 is het boek uit 2010 dus geen probleem denk ik zo

maar ik ga er natuurlijk niet over

comics must be at least 1 year old unless things go bankrupt then I think it's different

this because of fixed book price at least for the nl providers

Have a look, lot 15 is 1 book from 2012, the rest is older

I think that's the policy for that

excellent seller of lot 15 by the way

lot 40 is the book from 2010 so no problem I think

but of course I'm not talking about it

The last book of Agent Orange is indeed from last year, but in the last six months of 2012. The comics are still mostly for sale in regular stores, although the Hardcovers are more difficult to obtain, so in those meaning it is a special lot.

Furthermore, it is a great opportunity to get them completely complete in one go and also hard cover! But I keep warning: watch the price!

Lot 40 is a nice album, but whether it is so difficult to obtain, I doubt that. But if there is a good price for it, then someone is satisfied again.

What's going on with lot 160 of the Bearer Auction ?

stripkavel 16 maandag. Dit 'zeldzame boek'  is gewoon bij de uitgever te koop hoor. En voor minder dan 50 euro.

Het lijkt erop dat de poster niet inbegrepen is bij stripkavel 67 van maandag. Dat kan, maar het lijkt me verstandig om dat dan expliciet te vermelden.

comic lot 16 monday . This 'rare book' is simplyfor sale at the publisher . And for less than 50 euros.

Looks like the poster isn't included with Monday's comic lot #67 . That is possible, but I think it would be wise to state this explicitly.

Wat is er aan de hand met kavel 160 van de Toonder-veiling?

Zo te zien hetzelfde als met kavel 1 t/m 159. staat gewoon (nog) niet (meer) online.

What is going on with lot 160 of the Toonder auction ?

Looks like the same as with lots 1 to 159. is just not (yet) online (anymore).

It seems the poster is not included with Monday Comic Lot 67 . You can, but I think it would be wise to state this explicitly

The poster is not included, the lot text has been adjusted.
Thanks for the report.

I would have liked something to be offered at the auction but cannot reach the auctioneer via email to send my details - (email not set up correctly ??)

Can you please give me your email address, then I try from my yahoo.com

Thx

Peggy

I am once again enthusiastically looking at two auctions from Wednesday's Tintin auction. Lots 1 and 3 are given the great title "grand plat". That doesn't really mean anything. Know what it means, so we can call those comics by their official name in the future. These are "grandes images".

Nick.

(contraction between premier plat et grandes images) = grand plat

Lots 1 and 3 are given the great title "grand plat".

This is stated in the subtitle and has been taken over from the Catawiki name of the relevant album series. Lot 3 already had Grande Image in the title, we will also place this in lot 1.

Thanks for the tip, the administrators may have to say something about the mentioned album series.

Boeken Kavel 40 is:

- eerste druk van een heruitgave (want bundeling van eerder los uitgegeven delen)

- gebonden boek met stofomslag (is afwezig bij het te veilen item)

Books Lot 40 is:

- first edition of a reissue (because bundling of previously separately published parts)

- bound book with dust jacket (is absent with the item to be auctioned)

You're welcome. Am in favor of adopting the English and French (official) names and that we do not come up with our own names that do not make sense.

Nick.

Lot 20 of the coin auction appears to be linked to an incorrect, no longer existing catalog number: 3432069.

This would be 3432373 ?

Hounddog, you are absolutely right. I have adjusted it inmddels.

Thank you for your attention and have a good weekend

I know it might be a little late (auction is already underway), but I had a question about lot 3 of the toy auction. Aren't those fèves? Of those figures that they put in the cake, especially in France, on the 1st Sunday of January?

That is in fact collected enormously and you have them of all kinds of figures. At CataWiki only the Smurfs are in it, but there are small figures of almost every cartoon character. More information can be found at this website .

Furthermore, this set found as Snow White 3 at this website with even more Disney characters. More detailed and a list of all Disney fèves can be found here . From this I can conclude that the figures cannot come from 1994, but at least from 1998 and maybe even 2001 (other version).

If so, I would like to add them to the fèves, but only this one, because I would have to copy the other one from the French site and I don't think that's neat.

Furthermore, I hope that the importers listen a little more to the auctioneer to also see more than Add 1 image. Unfortunately, many items at the toy auction have only 1 image. I have now corrected the Disney items.

It's the series from 1998 . The copies from 2001 (for the Spanish market) do not have the French names on them.

Incidentally, Épiphanie (Epiphany) is always on January 6. And these fèves ("beans") have almost certainly never seen a pie.