LastDodo site & app/Testgebruikers gezocht voor nieuwe zoekmachine

Beste mensen,

Achter de schermen is hard gewerkt aan het herschrijven van de zoekmachine met de nieuwste tools die we hebben.

Diverse beheerders hebben inmiddels al meegetest en vandaag willen we de testgroep iets groter maken, namelijk: iedereen die zin en tijd heeft.

Met onderstaande link kom je op een nieuwe zoekpagina (let op: testopstelling met live data, dus als je iets wijzigt aan een item is het voor echie) waarop je naar hartelust kunt testen met het zoekvenster bovenin en alle filters, zoekresultaten, afbeeldingen en dergelijke. Zodra je ergens anders op klikt klap je naar de huidige site; hou daar rekening mee.

We zijn heel benieuwd naar jullie vragen, meningen, klachten, snelheidservaringen, complimenten (!) (;-), wat dan ook. Ook naar het gebruik op mobiele telefoons zijn we heel nieuwsgierig.

Dus: kom maar op!

https://www.lastdodo.nl/nl/areas/search?q=kuifje

(Ondertussen werken wij door aan veel meer moois...)

Dear people,

A lot of hard work has been going on behind the scenes to rewrite the search engine with the latest tools we have.

Various administrators have already participated in the test and today we want to expand the test group slightly, namely: everyone who feels like it and has the time.

The link below takes you to a new search page (note: test setup with live data, so if you change something on an item it's for real) where you can test to your heart's content with the search window at the top and all filters, search results, images and the like . As soon as you click on something else, you flip to the current site; Keep in mind.

We are very curious about your questions, opinions, complaints, speed experiences, compliments (!) (;-), whatever. We are also very curious about the use on mobile phones.

So: come on!

https://www.lastdodo.nl/nl/areas/search?q=kuifje

(Meanwhile we are working on much more beautiful things...)

https://www.lastdodo.nl/nl/areas/search?q=Suikerzakjes

Ik zie de rubriek suikerzakjes er niet tussen de bovenste 8 rubrieken.  Het zou handig zijn als de rubriek die ervoor is ertussen zou staan.

https://www.lastdodo.nl/nl/areas/search?q=Suikerzaks

I don't see the section sugar sachets between the top 8 sections. It would be useful if the heading before it were included.

We deliberately did not do that, because then you will also see the entire section under it as separate items. Maybe think again.

First impression: beautiful and handy. Compliments.

Small test I noticed 1 thing (call it beautify).
In the header I neatly get 61 Catalog sections.
The 'header' then repeatedly indicates the following headings when I go to the next page with results. So that takes some getting used to, but works.

The disadvantage is when I have clicked a few pages further, and the number of Catalog headings is 'finished', and there are still enough results.
Example appears on page 6: Catalog sections 61 No sections found

This can be confusing for people.
You have not yet seen every result (page) and the impression is given that there are no more sections, which is correct, because the display is talking about (bottom) total pages. Not my biggest problem if you understand how it works, but I'll indicate it.

It can be easily solved (visually) to make an entry there (when the end of rubrics is reached), or a simple link to / reference & gt; all sections, so that the impression is immediately created: this is the end of the section, and here you can go back ... One could also choose a number of result displays (per 40/80 pages etc .. but that would have an adverse effect on the speed of the site with many users) (tech: number of queries becomes very high with display).
Hope I have stated it clearly.

It is not the intention that the sections at the top switch when you go to a new page. Well spotted! We are going to look at that.

We have fixed this issue.

Okay. fine.
Then I have 2 small points .. I am a bit lazy hihi (PC use where I do not try to think of myself personally, but try to view it for a user in general. Personal taste is always something different ...) .. & gt;

a) the 'prev & lt; & gt; next' (page numbering) cannot also be used at the top right next to Item and for For sale crammed in between.?
In such a way that he is twice on the page (top and bottom). Will scrolling make a difference for mobile users? ...

b) bottom right & gt; Quickly go to (field) = numeric (p number) & gt; alt / hover text that you have to hit enter? (yes it seems so logical .. but still ..)


Furthermore, imo will tell time whether something can be improved or whether it is more convenient (in general use).

To keep up with Tintin, on my android phone I see: 26506 from 000 by - 0 filters. If I use other filter I see: 1607 from 000 - 1 filter.

I wonder why those: of 000 are on the screen. I don't see that on the pc.

And how does this work within a section?

I also think it looks good, you can find even more errors with it.

Thank you. Reported.

Filter problem is already pending. I have reported other things. Thanks!

In the old version the filter option was not there, and I cannot discover it in the new search engine either:

How do I make a selection of books by an author where the field "Original title" is not filled ?

Someone?

You will soon go to the gallery of the author and there you can select 'not filled in' per area ... Is in the testing phase and works fine.

Edit: sorry, even in the new search engine it already works .

Ah, maybe I had just tried it out with authors with everything entered ?!

Nice addition.

In the current version there are 20 per page (which was already annoying), in the new version 40 per page. Put those page numbers at the top too, you are scrolling crazy.

Can you try to explain in which situation you want to jump to a certain page in the search engine?

We added 'recently changed' to the sort. That might help, but I get your point.

The 'quickly go to box' can now contain 4 digits and no longer runs on an error with too large numbers, I think.

So there is "something" that breaks the date / user, which of course results in a wrong result.

That "something" is the fact that the item was added to a shop on the most recent date. This will be recorded as a change, but not reflected in the History.

Yes, that is a known bug that we will fix ...