Music/Is this 3x the same18 messages

Why 3 scans are too few take this item Atom Heart Mother 1970 then select W Germany 3 items but are the 3 the same?

When we see the inside of the cover and actually had to which are as scan 2 (for track overview) you might have had some clarity. Hör Zu is probably mentioned?

This can be an indication, but also scan back, scan of label? (we miss it once)

In addition, mention of the inner sleeve?

All these scans determine the value of the item Hör Zu on the label already indicates the first or second pressing / release .

And especially with Pink Floyd these can increase in price.

Besides the fact that there might be 2 double items in it, we are talking about W German edition.

And just an item that has just been entered, presumably for the auction!

Catawikilj is not supported as a catalog, it is still a missed opportunity in terms of completeness and commercially!

Lijkt om in totaal 2 verschillende platen te gaan.

De ene van Stillife en de Veilingmeester lijken hetzelfde

en de andere van wederom Stillife is anders, maar alleen maar omdat

er geen bewijs is dat ie niet hetzelfde is als de twee anderen.

 

Seems to be a total of 2 different plates.

Stillife's and the Auctioneer's look the same

and the other from Stilllife again is different, but only because

there is no evidence that he is not the same as the other two.

As a layman I can see that 10415 and 3892225 have different labels, although that label was added later to the former.

But something else: can someone explain to me why 10415 and 11847 states that those entered by still-life , while according to History, both are Rene was ??

Dat is duidelijk dat bij 1 het label ontbreekt alleen er zijn zeker 12 variante van dit W Duitse album + 5 quadraphonic uitvoeringen de voorzijde hoes is gelijk de 5, haal je er wel uit deze is voorzijde afwijkend tov de 12

Maar de rest zit in het label in achterzijde hoes en in de binnenzijde van hoes en de eerste 2hebben geen witte standaard binnenhoes en de eerste 2 quadraphonic ook niet.

Hoe weet je dat als je een standaard binnenhoes hebt etc, gevolg kan zijn je het de eerste uitgave met witte binnenhoes waar zie je dan (buiten label om) dat je een eerste uitgave  bezit? Het probleem is ook de hor zu hoes was gewoon in voorraad vermoedelijk, toen andere labels ontstonden.

En zie je dat op de hoes staan ga je er vanuit dat het hor zu is terwijl de afspraak is dat label leidend is zie historie bij invoer van veilingmeester.

Veel gegevens zijn dus niet controleerbaar met 3 scans nu weet ik ook wel dat we nu eenmaal aan die 3 scans zitten.

Maar in eigen verzameling kan je ook minimaal 2 scans kwijt maar een veiling invoer heeft geen eigen verzameling. Hoe kan je dan een veiling item koppellen?

It is clear that with 1 the label is missing, only there are certainly 12 variants of this W German album + 5 quadraphonic versions, the front cover is the same as the 5, you can take it out, this front is different from the 12

But the rest is in the label in the back cover and in the inside of the cover and the first 2 do not have a white standard inner cover and the first 2 quadraphonic do not either.

How do you know that if you have a standard inner sleeve etc, it could be the first edition with a white inner sleeve, where do you see (apart from the label) that you own a first edition? The problem is also the hor zu cover was just in stock presumably, when other labels emerged.

And if you see that on the cover, you assume that it is hor zu, while the agreement is that the label is leading, see history at the auctioneer's input.

So a lot of data cannot be checked with 3 scans, now I also know that we are dealing with those 3 scans.

But you can also place at least 2 scans in your own collection, but an auction entry does not have its own collection. How can you link an auction item?

Maar iets anders: kan iemand me uitleggen waarom er bij 10415 en 11847 staat dat die zijn ingevoerd door still-life, terwijl het volgens de Historie bij allebei Rene was ??

Dat kan Rene of Jilles lijkt me. Dit is gewoon invoer van het begin test periode

10415 invoer maart 2008 allemaal in testperiode 11847 ook maart test periode

vermoedelijk heeft men toen zitten klooien? kan me voorstellen dat ze de plaatjes geleend hebben

Dat er later een label is toegevoegd wat er wel bij zou kunnen horen we hebben de binnen zijde van de hoes niet.

welke wel te zien is in de shop van second life shop Ik heb hem dan ook gevraagd het item van hem op catawiki te plaatsen dit is vermoedelijk de 4 uitgave misschien gelijk aan veilingmeester invoer?

 

 

 

But something else: can someone explain to me why it says at 10415 and 11847 that they were entered by still-life , while according to the History it was Rene for both ??

Rene or Jilles can do that, I think. This is just input from the start test period

10415 input March 2008 all in test period 11847 also March test period

presumably they were messing around then? I imagine they borrowed the pictures

That a label was added later that could belong to it, we do not have the inside of the cover.

which can be seen in the shop of second life shop I have therefore asked him to place his item on Catawiki, this is probably the 4th edition, perhaps the same as auctioneer entry?

As a layman I can see that 10415 and 3892225 have different labels, although that label was only added later to the former.

This may be due to the scan, they are only done in Harvest green

one seems greener the other yellower

it is either the 3 or the 4 edition, but that can only be found via matrix number if the inside cover is there Printed in Germany or UK Harvest logo

hence the scan on the inside of the cover for sale, it would be the fourth item regarding the cover.

This may be due to the scan, they are only executed in Harvest green

The positioning of the texts is not the same. That cannot be due to the scan.

GIF

Indeed, but then we are no further 2 items differ the third is unknown. In addition, what does everyone have in their collection in their shop? In addition to the data, there may be a variant that has not yet been described. But you need a lot of information for that outside of the scans. But they are two different items very well seen

Mind you, more than 100 of this album have been sold so there will be plenty of pictures on the neti

I think René or Jilles can do that. This is just entry from the beginning test period

@ Dick52 I have no idea where the Still Life entry is coming from. The first entry of Still-life is on 25-03-2008: 14:10:28, by the way all entries have the same entry time. I think a database was added at the time. But that was before my time ....

My first addition to the record section was this one: 126541 on 09-03-2008.

Yours: 229563 on 31-01 -2009

@ Jilles thanks, Rene or Marco will have an answer for this. The question is why with item Still-life and with history you cannot see his name. Could be a file supplied by Still-life read in by Rene and then put by name.

Of Still-Life is een pseudoniem voor iemand die deze catalogus site mee heeft opgericht ?

 

Bij invoeren van mijn vinyl maxisingles kwam ik die naam al honderden keren tegen.

Or Still-Life is a pseudonym for someone who co-founded this catalog site ?

When I entered my vinyl maxi singles I came across that name hundreds of times.

I also invented it, but there is a photo, but that can also be fake

@ Jilles thanks, Rene or Marco will have an answer for this. The question is why with item Still-life and with history you do not see his name. Could be a file supplied by Still-life read in by Rene and then put in name.

Of Still-Life is a pseudonym for someone who co-founded this catalog site?

Ah, a blast from the past!

We read the Still-life collection from the very beginning (March 2008) from Catawiki. At that time René and I were the only users :-)

Still-life is a collector friend with a nice record collection of which we were allowed to use his data.

@ Marco, thanks, this suddenly gives a lot of clarity.

And yet another corner of the veil of CataWiki's history has been revealed! Already 5 years old (??) and more and more is coming to light about this. When will the anniversary book or special anniversary promotion come? Or did I miss something?

Or did I miss something?

The beginning