LastDodo site & app/Administrator power49 messages

Who can tell me how far the power of administrators extends?

I disagree that administrators can just disapprove items without consulting beforehand. Entering it is a lot of work and if it is just picked up you have to look everything up again.

I think this is very unreasonable and especially if they are wrong.

I plead for an opinion instead of a disapproval.

I would like to hear opinions about this.

Greeting

Willem

Arobesqueshop

When approved, administrators never frivolously disapprove of anything. If they are convinced that something is duplicate or should be rejected in its entirety for some other reason, for example because no own images have been used or it has been entered in a very wrong section, then there is usually a reason. disapproval given to the importer.

Because a lot is entered, something can of course go wrong in the assessment of the manager. It is best to discuss this with the relevant administrator. If you feel that you are really being treated unreasonably, you can possibly raise this with us.

To be on the safe side, administrators are volunteers who do a great job keeping the catalog in order as much as possible. We all benefit from that.

Hello Rene,

thank you, but if it concerns, for example, an alleged wrong section, then the item can also be changed after consultation?

Willem

The tricky part is that all sections have different input fields and the transfer is therefore still a complex and time-consuming process that only a select group of administrators can perform.

That explains why importers are often asked to enter it in the correct section instead of being moved by an administrator to the correct section.

This is something for us to improve even more so that the transfer by administrators will work more easily and more administrators have this option.

Het heeft ook wel iets met de kwaliteit van de invoer te maken natuurlijk. Zaken die met minimale info in de catalogus gepleurd worden met als enig doel ze te laten veilen nodigen niet echt uit om daar eens veel beheertijd in te gaan steken om dat over te zetten en recht te breien. Als de zaken die zijn afgekeurd een heel klein beetje het niveau hadden van dit item (dat dus ook per onmiddelijk afgekeurd moet worden) begrijp ik de betrokken beheerders helemaal.

It also has something to do with the quality of the input, of course. Things that are stuffed into the catalog with minimal information for the sole purpose of having them auctioned do not really invite you to invest a lot of management time in order to transfer and rectify that. If the things that were rejected were a little bit the level of this item (which must therefore also be rejected immediately) I completely understand the administrators involved.

(which must therefore also be rejected immediately)

That is therefore also immediately rejected.

3670187 then anyway?

Yes, even.

Sic transit malum input ......

Nor does the power lie with the administrators.

More the involvement of the importers in the catalog.

Take this item clear to fill the screen what has been posted, only the link with the net for what the content is missing

3775409

Thank you Dick52,

so it's mine! But it has not been rejected either.

Willem

Arobesqueshop

Hallo Dick,

we zitten inderdaad met een hele andere pet op.

Catawiki maakt veel reclame voor de veilingen en is uiteraard op zoek naar veel aanbieders/verkopers en kopers.

Ik ben zo'n aanbieder en zit er niet op te wachten dat mijn producten voor de kavels afgekeurd worden.

Tevens ben ik ook verzamelaar dus ik begrijp jouw standpunt wel maar als je goed op de materie van het verzamelen ingaat dan ontbreekt er zo wie zo ontzettend veel bijvoorbeeld bij muziek wat mijn specialisme is. Als je iets over the Beatles of Stones wilt weten mbt de discografie dan ga je daarvoor naar gespecialiseerde sites.

Naar mijn mening wordt het veiling gedeelte van Catawiki in rap tempo het belangrijkste aspect. Dat is jammer voor de verzamelaars maar het is logisch dat de verkopers niet hele dagen aan het invoeren kunnen gaan besteden. daar zitten ook veel professionals tussen.

Die 2 zaken botsen met elkaar en zouden naar mijn bescheiden mening uit elkaar getrokken moeten worden.

Groet

Willem

Hello Dick,

we are indeed wearing a completely different hat.

Catawiki advertises the auctions a lot and is of course looking for many suppliers/sellers and buyers.

I am such a supplier and I am not waiting for my products to be rejected for the lots.

I am also a collector so I understand your point of view, but if you go into the matter of collecting well, then there is so much that is missing, for example in music, which is my specialty. If you want to know something about the Beatles or Stones in terms of discography, you go to specialized sites.

In my opinion, the auction section of Catawiki is quickly becoming the most important aspect. That is a pity for the collectors, but it is logical that the sellers cannot spend whole days importing them. there are also many professionals among them.

Those 2 things collide with each other and should be pulled apart in my humble opinion.

Greeting

William

Sic transit malum input ......

Salvo errore et omissione .....

Hallo Dick,

ja, daar heb je zeker een punt mee.

Ebay zit ik ook niet op te wachten. Ik ben een Catawiki fan, ik vind het op zich een fantastisch concept.

Maar toch denk ik dat ik ook een goed punt heb.

Bedenk hoe de toekomst eruit gaat zien. catawiki timmert enorm aan de weg met hun veilingen, zij gaan ook internationaal.

Dan is het helemaal niet moeilijk om je voor te stellen dat er steeds minder verzamelaars komen maar wel steeds meer handelaars. En die zullen minder en minder trek hebben om al die gegevens in te gaan vullen.

Nu zijn het zo'n 90.000 aangeslotenen maar dadelijk misschien wel 500.000 en dan?

Groet

Willem

Hello Dick,

yes, you definitely have a point there.

I can't wait for eBay either. I'm a Catawiki fan, I think it's a fantastic concept in itself.

But I think I have a good point too.

Think about what the future will look like. catawiki is making great progress with their auctions, they also go international.

Then it is not at all difficult to imagine that there are fewer and fewer collectors, but more and more dealers. And they will have less and less appetite to fill in all that data.

Now there are about 90,000 affiliates, but soon perhaps 500,000 and then?

Greeting

William

As a collector, I love salespeople who don't do their homework. That will give me the best bargains.

The better the description, the greater the chance that other people will find the offer and outbid me.

Hello Big Bad Wolf,

Thank you for your contribution. I totally agree with that, but if the administrator is wrong then it is very annoying and the item is already rejected.

I also do not want to disparage all administrators. I can remember that you sometimes corrected me in the beginning, but in a very positive way.

Everything stands or falls with a good input, or a start of it.

This should also be rejected, I think. Sorry, but this was just intentionally entered incorrectly and not an accident.

And at this and this and this and this also has to be checked whether they can be admitted, especially if you look at image 2. But of course I can be wrong.

And these I don't trust either.

A little self-perfection wouldn't hurt, I think.

Al I agree wholeheartedly that the auctions should be completely disconnected from the catalog. At the moment, that link radiates a kind of false reliability. And I don't like that.

And at this and this and this and this also needs to be checked carefully to see if they can be admitted, especially if you look at image 2. But of course I can be wrong.

Those are bootlegs, no more than a blank cover with a pasted plate on the front see: this

Only it is a pity that not all images are the same size.

Also saw that I have to add some extra images to my previously entered bootlegs .....

Hello Arco,

All these LPs are 100% correctly entered there is nothing wrong with that. Now you are entering dangerous territory, those backs are like that and since the backs are required to be depicted, that is indeed a strange sight yes.

What's wrong with it? Woodstock booklet? It is mine too and it was not entered incorrectly at all on purpose. Where do you think the mistake is?

Today I saw a whole series of lots at the art auction that have no catalog items attached at all! I thought this was not allowed?

Dick, what's the story behind Ticket to Ride?

Well, 100% correct ... I do have the impression that image 1 here and there comes from other websites. And that is not the intention.

Now you are entering dangerous territory.

There is no dangerous territory here, mind you. It is always very pleasant here.

But of course I can be wrong.

And now I am quoting myself. I do not understand bootlegs.

But if image 1 is suddenly flawless compared to image 2, then I do indeed think it is not a scan of your own item. Same goes for that book. And what's the point of such a tiny Image 3?