Books/Suggest items to merge29 messages

Would one of the administrators of this section modify these items? I see little difference between: 6690381 and 6690383

Thanks in advance for your cooperation

.

You're welcome

The following items that may be merged: 6696379 and 6696381

These also please: 3228621 and 3384835

Thanks!

Catawiki number: 5219025 looks suspiciously like 3377323 , at least I see no difference.

If others do not see this any difference I think both can be merged.

That's right.

Catwiki 7647725 dual use 3380205

Thanks for the tip. The latest has been removed.

Sorry, I made a mistake. I entered the book by Jack Vance - Lyonesse: The Garden of Suldrun with catawiki number 7951441. But upon closer inspection it turned out to be there anyway. Can someone delete this item?

Thanks, Regards Ron

Done.

1471567

and

6099541

(Hunters) are the same, (There were two series of books Moussault's Small Aviation Encyclopedia and without "Moussault's" in front). When merging, this double appeared.

Catawiki number: 5704169

and

Catawiki number: 8003149

(A general from the wilderness) are the same boo: One with the other without a dust cover

And what number of pages is correct?

The number of pages are both 286?

WWW 1958 Catawiki nummer: 714125 

 en

Catawiki nummer: 4380743

Zijn gelijk

WWW 1958 Catawiki number: 714125

and

Catawiki number: 4380743

Are even

Two of the same books:

With dust jacket:
https://www.lastdodo.nl/catalogus/boeken/ authors / bradley-marion-zimmer / 213959-storms-over-troje

Without dust jacket:
https://www.lastdodo.nl/catalogus/boeken/ authors / bradley-marion-zimmer / 4959413-storms-over-troje

The latter is for sale, so think merging will be difficult.

Can't you add 3 images (front cover, back cover, front cover)?

Doesn't matter that much. The seller has a photo of his goods in his shop. However, with fig 3 front cover without dust jacket. It would be nicer if there was an image of the dust jacket back

I'll add the back of the cover to the first today.

I hadn't even noticed that yet.

Fig. 1 is just a stamp *. It is always better to replace all scans with photos of the same copy. This way you avoid, for example, that different pressures are mixed up.

* Perhaps the programmers can cause images that are too small to be rejected in the future? And that at least the back of the book will be mandatory.

Certainly the latter, but I needed a dev for that and now we have it ... (;-)

I just uploaded the front and back cover of the same size at the first Storms Over Troy.

Objects https: // www. lastdodo.nl/catalogus/boeken/auteurs/nieuwenhuijzen-kees/4515195-rotterdam-gefotografeerd-in-de-19de-eeuw

& amp;

https: //www.lastdodo .nl / catalog / books / authors / nieuwenhuyzen-kees / 5660411-rotterdam-photographed-in-the-19th-century

I think they are the same.

The first has the publisher on the front. The 2nd one doesn't have that.

The first has the publisher on the front. The 2nd one doesn't have that.

Ah, I hadn't seen that. Thx.

so two different ones.