Go to page
25of 44
  • Catalogue manager
  • 8,580 messages
  • January 08, 2010 18:39
10K
added
1K
prices
50
info pages
250K
reviews
5K
posts
January 08, 2010 18:39

It would be nice if users would occasionally search their own collection or shop for the word "doublure" in the title.
And then "transfer" itself to the correct item. As soon as there are no more collectors / shops with a duplication, we can permanently remove the item.
By the way, this only applies to items that duplicate an item in another staging area.
Duplications within one staging area - for example "Comics" - are already being merged regularly.

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • 1,463 messages
  • January 08, 2010 19:25
1K
posts
January 08, 2010 19:25

That would be nice.
I just have the feeling that most of them don't check this forum If I may suggest something extreme.
We could give each duplicate the year 1860.
That way they are at the forefront of your comics collection when you look at “all comics”, and they don't get between the oldest items Within Catawiki.
We can then adjust the titles in “Duplication of item xxxxx, choose the original item for your collection, then this item can be removed.”

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • Catalogue administrator
  • 215 messages
  • January 09, 2010 02:26
1K
added
1K
prices
1K
reviews
100
posts
January 09, 2010 02:26

Perhaps even more convenient is that administrators can check those albums so that they can no longer be changed or added to a collection and that they are automatically deleted when no one has them in their collection shop or manco list
saves work again from
Also, every time someone consults or logs in their collection page / shop page and owns such items, you can place these items visibly and in an annoying way on their screen with the call to check and change them to the correct item and if still possible, we could add the Catawiki number of the presumably correct item
this way you will give everyone extra encouragement to adjust it themselves
this catawiki number can be placed by the same administrator as the one who marked the item as duplicate, which creates an extra security because there must always be a number when something is checked as duplicate so that no items accidentally disappear
of course, it will have to be investigated what is technically possible and feasible

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • Catalogue administrator
  • 215 messages
  • January 09, 2010 02:31
1K
added
1K
prices
1K
reviews
100
posts
January 09, 2010 02:31

I would also immediately make them invisible in the catalog which immediately ensures that someone who has such an item in his shop will move it very quickly (by making them invisible in the catalog you do not have to delete them automatically but can then be done manually)
of course you must ensure that administrators can still consult these items

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • Catalogue administrator
  • 215 messages
  • January 09, 2010 02:48
1K
added
1K
prices
1K
reviews
100
posts
January 09, 2010 02:48

this is how you ensure that administrators have more control over these items
it is therefore no longer necessary to send emails (which are not read) to warn users and encourage them to take action
administrators can then put their time and effort into other things
this data pollution is invisible to users and easy to remove because it is grouped together
this seems like a win win situation to me and I fall short because I can't think of minus points right away
hopefully the forumbers will respond to this when they do see it

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • 1,463 messages
  • January 09, 2010 07:42
1K
posts
January 09, 2010 07:42

Automating such things would indeed save a lot of double checking.
If you only let administrators with merge rights indicate whether something is actually a duplicate, I don't think strange things can happen.

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • 289 messages
  • January 09, 2010 19:16
5K
added
5K
prices
100
info pages
25K
reviews
250
posts
January 09, 2010 19:16

Automatic deletion seems a good one, an administrator could give the item a certain characteristic which can be used as a trigger.
In the current situation I request that everyone who has the item in collection, shop or search list contains the duplication from the collection and indicate where / how the right item can be found.
Unfortunately, it sometimes happens that an item is considered to be duplicate, without anyone being informed, I do not find it very useful.
Perhaps the possibility can be built in to write all people who have linked the item to the list of values, shop or collection at once?

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • Catalogue administrator
  • 2,403 messages
  • January 09, 2010 19:20
10K
added
10K
prices
25
info pages
500K
reviews
2.5K
posts
January 09, 2010 19:20

Indicating something as duplication and being able to find it in a collection means that the phrase duplication should replace the series / hero instead of (or also) in the title

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • Catalogue manager
  • 8,580 messages
  • January 09, 2010 19:30
10K
added
1K
prices
50
info pages
250K
reviews
5K
posts
January 09, 2010 19:30

The latter is difficult for the administrator who has to determine whether an indicated duplication is also REALLY and has yet to be agreed, Jilles.
No, let's just keep it as agreed for now. Arwin's idea about 1860 does provide more exposure, I think.

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • Catalogue administrator
  • 215 messages
  • January 09, 2010 20:36
1K
added
1K
prices
1K
reviews
100
posts
January 09, 2010 20:36

@ 1955-chevy no automatic write option for items, because if this becomes possible I will receive more unwanted e-mails by Catawiki

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • 234 messages
  • January 09, 2010 21:11
250
added
500
prices
100
posts
January 09, 2010 21:11

@ 1955-chevy
I don't think this is undesirable because it serves the public interest.
And if you make sure that duplicates do not appear in your collection, you will not receive any more mail about it ...

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • Catalogue manager
  • 8,580 messages
  • January 10, 2010 03:26
10K
added
1K
prices
50
info pages
250K
reviews
5K
posts
January 10, 2010 03:26

I would very much welcome such a "multi-mail function" for use by administrators ...

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • 1,463 messages
  • January 10, 2010 07:22
1K
posts
January 10, 2010 07:22

About making it difficult for administrators if you also add duplicates to serial name.
You can always find this kind of information in the history of an item.
Personally, I always first look at the history of both items to see if no crazy things have happened there, that of a normal item. duplicate.

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • Catalogue administrator
  • 1,755 messages
  • January 10, 2010 23:41
2.5K
added
5K
prices
10
info pages
25K
reviews
1K
posts
January 10, 2010 23:41

The title duplication of item 1234567 does not contain useful information for users for rebooking, because only administrators can search by number.

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • Catalogue manager
  • 8,580 messages
  • January 11, 2010 01:17
10K
added
1K
prices
50
info pages
250K
reviews
5K
posts
January 11, 2010 01:17

No, Pegag, that has now been arranged.

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
Rene
TOP
  • LastDodo Team
  • 6,172 messages
  • February 08, 2010 13:39
250
added
500
prices
100K
reviews
5K
posts
February 08, 2010 13:39

Somehow I had completely overlooked this topic but I just came across quite a few unjustified changes from the year to 1860 that I was disapproving :-)
I propose not to change the year anymore (the overview of oldest comics will look strange otherwise) but to give me and Marco a little time to give administrators the option to merge items across the sections. Then collectors and shops are automatically transferred. We already know roughly how to do this, it just needs to be developed.
As long as it is all marked as "duplication" in the title, it can already be deduplicated within the section and soon also across the sections.

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • Catalogue administrator
  • 99 messages
  • February 12, 2010 13:01
2.5K
added
500
prices
50K
reviews
100
posts
February 12, 2010 13:01

Will there also be a possibility to move items to the categories where they belong?

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • Catalogue administrator
  • 2,403 messages
  • February 23, 2010 10:10
10K
added
10K
prices
25
info pages
500K
reviews
2.5K
posts
February 23, 2010 10:10

It is intended, but how it will be implemented?

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • 469 messages
  • February 23, 2010 10:22
1K
added
500
prices
250
posts
February 23, 2010 10:22

Maybe with a pull down, "move to"?
As with hotmail, you can move an email to any folder you want.

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • 4,308 messages
  • March 12, 2010 13:00
500
added
250
prices
25
info pages
2.5K
posts
March 12, 2010 13:00

I suspect that 971341 is a duplicate of 20830 , but because the latter has no scan of the back (and only 1 publisher) I cannot say for sure. How do administrators deal with this? Are the collectors and sellers (none of whom bothered to scan the back) being emailed for more information?
Edit: I conclude from the history of the oldest item that it must indeed be the same edition and that the publisher Amsterdam Boek was wrongly removed from Version 4.

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • Catalogue manager
  • 8,580 messages
  • March 12, 2010 14:48
10K
added
1K
prices
50
info pages
250K
reviews
5K
posts
March 12, 2010 14:48

You are absolutely right.
They have now been merged.

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • 4,308 messages
  • December 15, 2011 13:38
500
added
250
prices
25
info pages
2.5K
posts
December 15, 2011 13:38

I suspect that 2327011 is a duplication of 1665787 , only an incorrect (Dutch) back was added to the latter last Monday. (By a seller who probably doesn't have the French version in his shop either.)

2326965 cannot be checked, without back.

2327245 will also be a duplicate of 43257 . But yes, no back either.

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • Catalogue administrator
  • 2,412 messages
  • December 15, 2011 15:26
500
added
500
prices
50
info pages
250
reviews
2.5K
posts
December 15, 2011 15:26

I think if you have gone through all possible steps as an administrator to ask the importer for more details, you can merge or delete the item (if there are no collectors posted yet).

If it really is a different item, then an importer, seller and / or collector must re-enter it with more details.

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • Catalogue administrator
  • 1,909 messages
  • January 01, 2012 14:18
100
added
1K
prices
50
info pages
25K
reviews
1K
posts
January 01, 2012 14:18

Could it be that 720305 and 1715271 are the same? I don't see any difference.

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
  • 4,308 messages
  • January 05, 2012 01:22
500
added
250
prices
25
info pages
2.5K
posts
January 05, 2012 01:22

I think this whole series can be deleted:

http://www.catawiki.nl/catalogus/strips/ album series / 16815-magazine-pub-to-be-continued

All so-called "clippings" have now been added to the entire magazines as a story, so that these items no longer fulfill any function.

Message has been translated from Dutch
Show original message
Go to page
25of 44