LastDodo site & app/Catawiki beat up ??11 messages

Sorry for the L in Catawiki, [Name of topic changed by moderator] but yes read on first:

Has no one noticed yet that some 'new collectors'

put absurd prices on their items ???

A 1982 coin with a circulation of 17500000 for 300.000 €

in RoshninCo Shop

A banknote from 2001 for 100,000 € in

mohammedkd Shop

In my opinion this should be banned. If interested people see these things, they will quickly look elsewhere, because Catawiki is not serious after all. What do others think about this ?????

Another peculiarity with the 1933 gold double eagle.

Normally it is thought that only one of these is in circulation and

yet 3 collectors claim to have one? ????

Well as for the new sellers, they get to decide for themselves what they charge for their items. I just think they won't have many buyers if they charge prices that are too high. The Turkish banknote man certainly thought the price was in Turkish Lira! ;)

The list price is concerned, and it remains low in the case of the 2001 banknote. It's just a matter of reading carefully and there are always price suggestions.

The existence of several items, of which only 1 copy was known until then, or a nice discovery or a few people were mistaken with another copy. Usually it looks a lot like it and it is the first thing they see and do not read any further. Likewise, there are several Beatles record owners that only Sir Paul McCartney can have and yet someone has it. Unless Sir Paul McCartney is also a CataWiki member, he still made a mistake. They probably aren't such active members either, because they often don't do much to change that.

As long as the content of an item is not affected, which is not the case, I think that there is no deterioration or decay of the CataWiki system yet. There are very good administrators who are very busy, but are never afraid to respond to an email. So if you see something wrong, you can just report it.

A 2001 banknote for 100,000 €

This banknote is still in the old liras ...

For the new value you have to remove 6 zeros = 20 new liras is about 8 euro ...

Lord Ernie is right that some sellers charge insane amounts.

Mij valt op dat er voor bijna alles absurd hoge prijzen gevraagd word.

De eerder genoemde voorbeelden zijn wel duidelijke uitschieters,

maar als je bijvoorbeeld ook bij  de vinyl-platen afdeling kijkt zie je bij veel items die totaal niet kunnen kloppen, of tenminste niet een prijskaartje hebben met een verkoopbare waarde.

Zou het niet beter zijn dat stafleden de prijsbepalingen doen?

Zolang de inhoud van een item niet aangetast wordt, en dat is niet het geval, vind ik dat er nog geen sprake is van verloedering of verval van het CataWiki-systeem. Er zijn hele goede beheerders die het erg druk hebben, maar nooit te beroerd zijn om op een e-mail te reageren. Dus mocht je iets fouts zien, dan kan je dat gewoon melden.

dit is dus een dilemma:

Beheerders hebben het inderdaad druk, maar wat is makkelijker voor hen;

hen de prijzen laten bepalen of telkens aanpassen

I notice that absurdly high prices are asked for almost everything.

The aforementioned examples are clear outliers,

but if you also look at the vinyl record department, for example, you will see many items that can't be right at all, or at least don't have a price tag with a salable value.

Wouldn't it be better if staff members do the pricing?

As long as the content of an item is not affected, which is not the case, I do not think that the CataWiki system has deteriorated or decayed. There are very good administrators who are very busy, but are never afraid to respond to an email. So if you see something wrong, you can just report it.

So this is a dilemma:

Administrators are indeed busy, but what could be easier for them;

let them determine the prices or adjust them every time

Prices, who knows, Beatles bought CDs 239759 I thought around fl. 375, = I think you can be fair if you get € 37.50 for it, the cardboard boxes may have some value.

And I think that is the case for 99% of the music carriers. That sometimes hefty prices are charged.

They only see $$$$ in their eyes. I do not want to call this degradation.

In my opinion, degradation is the minimal involvement with a number of sellers including auction parties, who place an item within the catalog with great pain and effort.

Or the collectors who purely only enter their own collection area with commitment and guidelines

And as soon as other collection area has to be filled with minimal effort and that is worse than the fantasy prices that they show in their shop no one is obliged to buy!

If items are entered correctly, the catalog will not get dented as quickly.

Only half entries and ridiculous prices are harmful

Neen hoor ze zijn als set uitgebracht ik meen om de maand, dat de CD's ook los verkrijgbaar waren is gewoon waar.

Ik zie dit als 1 set.

En om ze in die 3 boxjes nog te krijgen zal lastig zijn maar de CD zelf zijn eigenlijk niets meer waard in €, nadat deze is uitgekomen 593481.

Maar we dwalen weer af. Verloederd Catawiki?

Ik denk nee, maar er mogen wel meer verplichte velden komen in veel rubrieken zo vind ik maatvoering een verplicht veld moet zijn.

En meer scans verplichten.

No, they were released as a set, I think every other month, that the CDs were also available separately is just true.

I see this as 1 set.

And to get them in those 3 boxes will be difficult, but the CD itself is actually worth nothing in €, after it has been released 593481 .

But we digress again. Dilapidated Catawiki?

I think no, but there may be more mandatory fields in many sections, so I think measurement should be a mandatory field.

And require more scans.

Vind het vooral erg als iemand naar alle categoriën gaat, en hij vraagt alle items te koop, dan krijgt hij

Het toeval wil nu dat ik hier op de vijfde plaats kom, dan kan je denken dat ik die eerste drie weg wil, maar de persoon met de gaming chip, wil de eerste drie ook weg en wie nu op plaats 7 en 8 staan  ZEKER.

Mijn dochter speelt op myfreefarm.nl en dat zij daar mogen prijzen invullen die ze willen, dat vind ik normaal ( ze betalen er echter ook een percentage op); maar hier moet het er toch iets ernstiger aan toe gaan of niet soms????

I especially mind if someone goes to all categories, and he asks for all items for sale, he gets

Coincidentally, I'm in fifth place here, so you might think I want the first three gone, but the person with the gaming chip wants the first three gone too, and whoever is now in 7th and 8th DEFINITELY.

My daughter plays on myfreefarm.nl and that they can fill in prices there that they want, I think that's normal (they also pay a percentage on it); but here it has to be something more serious or not?

• Nog zo een eigenaardigheid met de gouden double eagle van 1933. Normaal wordt gedacht dat hiervan maar één meer in omloop is en toch beweren 3 verzamelaars er een te hebben?????

Mag dat eigenlijk of is dat ECHTE fraude, want ze hebben alle drie namaak in hun verzameling

• Another oddity with the golden double eagle of 1933. Normally only one of these is thought to be in circulation and yet 3 collectors claim to have one?????

Is that actually allowed or is that REAL fraud, because all three have counterfeits in their collection